Why Crumbl Cookies Face Growing Public Discontent
Crumbl Cookies, with their iconic pink boxes and weekly rotating menu, have undeniably carved out a significant niche in the dessert market. From its humble beginnings in 2017, the company, founded by cousins Sawyer Hemsley and Jason McGowan, rapidly expanded, captivating millions with its oversized, often elaborate, cookie creations. A Crumbl franchise recently opened in my neighborhood, and there is constantly a line of people at the store right up until closing time, a testament to their widespread appeal. However, beneath the surface of viral TikTok dances and enthusiastic unboxing videos, a growing chorus of criticism has emerged, leading many to question: why do people hate Crumbl, or at least, why is there such a strong backlash against it?
While plenty of customers give Crumbl's bright pink boxes and oversized cookies their unconditional love, if you do some digging, you'll find plenty of controversy has been brewing. This article aims to explore why Crumbl Cookies faces increasing criticism worldwide, delving into issues of inconsistency, pricing, authenticity, and the powerful role of social media in shaping public opinion. We'll uncover the multifaceted reasons behind the growing sentiment that Crumbl is low-quality trash that isn’t worth the calories whatsoever, and examine the valid points raised by those who feel the company falls short of expectations.
Table of Contents
- The Culinary Conundrum: Taste, Texture, and Quality Control
- The Price Point Puzzle: Are Crumbl Cookies Worth It?
- Health Implications: More Than Just a Treat?
- Ethical Quandaries and Corporate Conduct
- The Social Media Echo Chamber: From Love to Loathing
- The Paradox of "Hate Promo" and Viral Cycles
- Crumbl's Founders Respond: Navigating Criticism and Growth
- The Local Bakery Alternative: A Different Kind of Cookie Experience
- Conclusion
The Culinary Conundrum: Taste, Texture, and Quality Control
Perhaps the most fundamental reason why people hate Crumbl revolves around the very product they sell: the cookies themselves. For many, the expectation of a premium, delicious cookie is simply not met, leading to significant disappointment. I finally got around to checking them out this evening, and I expected the cookies to be quite good, due to the hype. However, personal experiences often diverge wildly from marketing. It seems a bit harsh, but honestly, I’ve had their chocolate chip cookie twice at separate locations and found them to be pretty gross both times. For my taste, they were way too sweet and lacked the depth of flavor one might expect from a gourmet cookie.
The Sweetness Overload and Flavor Fatigue
A recurring complaint centers on the overwhelming sweetness of Crumbl's offerings. Many consumers describe them as "sugar bomb cookies," a sentiment echoed by those who find that some Crumbl cookies are simply too sweet. This isn't just a matter of preference; for some, the excessive sugar content makes the cookies almost inedible. "Eating more than half of one of those cookies makes me sick," one customer lamented, highlighting the intense richness that can be off-putting. This level of sweetness can overshadow any nuanced flavors the cookie might possess, leading to a one-dimensional taste experience. The classic pink sugar cookie, for instance, one of the most controversial cookies Crumbl has produced, often draws criticism for having "too strong of an almond flavor" on top of its sugary base, further alienating those who prefer a more balanced profile. While many of the chocolate cookies might be less intensely sweet, the overall perception remains that Crumbl prioritizes sugar over subtlety.
The Unpredictable Nature of Quality
Beyond the sweetness, inconsistency in quality control is another major pain point. Customers frequently report wildly varying experiences from one visit to the next, or even between different franchise locations. This leads to a sense of unreliability, where a cookie that was fantastic one week might be disappointing the next. "The quality control is atrocious," one critic pointed out, and this sentiment is widely shared. When a brand builds its reputation on a premium product, a lack of consistent quality can quickly erode trust. For instance, while some might love their sugar cookie, others find it lacking. "People either love or hate Crumbl's sugar cookie," one user observed, indicating the divisive nature that often stems from inconsistent execution. This unpredictability contributes significantly to why people hate Crumbl, as consumers expect a certain standard for the price they pay.
The Price Point Puzzle: Are Crumbl Cookies Worth It?
With an enticing aroma and those iconic pink boxes, Crumbl might lure you into the store, but they aren't exactly cheap. This brings us to another significant factor contributing to the negative sentiment: the cost. A Crumbl cookie isn’t just any $5 cookie—it’s a $5 cookie you line up for. This price tag naturally sets a high expectation for quality, size, and taste. When those expectations aren't met, the perceived value plummets, fueling the question: are these oversized treats worth the cost?
The $5 Cookie Conundrum
For many, the answer is a resounding no. "Crumbl is low quality trash that isn’t worth the calories whatsoever," is a harsh but common assessment. The argument often made is that for the same price, or even less, one could find a superior product elsewhere. "Go to any other local bakery that uses real ingredients and get a cookie about the size of Crumbls, and it will have half the [sugar/calories/cost]," suggests a frustrated customer. While I acknowledge that when I do go, it's worth every penny for treating myself, this is often an exception rather than the rule for regular purchases. The perception of overpricing for an inconsistent or overly sweet product is a core reason why people hate Crumbl and feel their money could be better spent. The value proposition simply doesn't hold up for a significant portion of the market, especially when compared to local bakeries that often offer a more authentic and high-quality experience.
Health Implications: More Than Just a Treat?
Beyond taste and price, the sheer caloric and sugar content of Crumbl cookies is a major concern for many consumers. While certain states may require different calorie disclosures, Crumbl makes an effort to make its cookies look healthier than they are, or at least, less intimidating than their true nutritional profile. When you walk into one of its bakeries, the focus is on indulgence and visual appeal, not necessarily on transparency about the sheer volume of sugar and fat in each cookie. This often leads to a shocking realization for customers who are mindful of their diet. "Eating more than half of one of those cookies makes me sick," isn't just about sweetness, but also the heavy, dense nature of the cookie that can lead to physical discomfort. "I couldn’t imagine eating multiple Crumbl cookies," highlights the difficulty in consuming even a single serving due to its richness. In an era where consumers are increasingly health-conscious, the perceived lack of transparency or the sheer scale of the cookies' nutritional impact contributes to the negative sentiment. For some, the cookies are simply not worth the guilt or the physical repercussions, adding another layer to why people hate Crumbl.
Ethical Quandaries and Corporate Conduct
Beyond the product itself, Crumbl's business practices and corporate ethics have come under fire, significantly contributing to the public backlash. For many, it's not just about the cookies; it's about the company's integrity. "I think some of the hate is justified… like the owners monopolizing off breast cancer week," is a strong accusation that points to deeper issues than just taste preferences.
Questionable Philanthropy and Business Practices
The accusation of "monopolizing off breast cancer week" refers to instances where the company was perceived to be profiting excessively from charitable campaigns, rather than genuinely supporting the cause. Such actions can quickly erode public trust and lead to accusations of corporate greed. This perception, whether entirely accurate or not, paints Crumbl in a negative light, suggesting that their primary motivation is profit, even at the expense of genuine social responsibility. Additionally, the company's rapid expansion and success have led some to believe that people seem to hate Crumbl because of the owners and like to hate on them for being so successful. While success itself shouldn't be a reason for hate, the perceived methods of achieving that success, especially if they involve questionable ethical decisions, can certainly fuel resentment. The news of layoffs in October 2023, citing strong economic conditions, also raises eyebrows, as layoffs are rarely a good sign and can indicate internal struggles or a prioritization of profits over employees.
Tipping Troubles and Customer Service Woes
Another point of contention is the company's approach to tipping. "Automatically defaulting to a $2 tip on the app and kiosk" has been a source of frustration for many customers. This practice can feel coercive, pressuring customers into tipping even for minimal service, or for services where tipping isn't traditionally expected. This seemingly small detail can leave a sour taste in customers' mouths, making them feel exploited. Furthermore, when issues arise, customer service response can be disappointing. "I emailed Crumbl corporate and they didn't care about the situation," one customer reported, leading to a strong personal boycott: "Because of this incident in August 2023 I refuse to step foot in any Crumbl Cookies in America." Such experiences, where corporate seemingly dismisses customer concerns, significantly contribute to the negative perception and provide a concrete reason why people hate Crumbl.
Animal Welfare Concerns: The Egg Debate
Despite Crumbl's viral popularity and rapid expansion, the company still uses eggs from hens confined to cruel cages—a practice increasingly condemned by consumers. As public awareness and concern for animal welfare grow, companies that continue to use products sourced from unethical practices face significant backlash. This issue goes beyond taste or price; it touches on a consumer's moral compass. For many, supporting a company that uses eggs from hens in cruel cages is simply unacceptable, regardless of how delicious the cookies might be. This ethical stance is a powerful motivator for some to actively dislike or boycott the brand, further explaining why people hate Crumbl.
The Social Media Echo Chamber: From Love to Loathing
Crumbl's meteoric rise was largely fueled by social media, particularly TikTok, where its weekly flavor reveals and aesthetic packaging went viral. However, the same platforms that built its empire are now amplifying its criticisms. A viral video prompts people into considering boycotting Crumbl after noticing something suspicious on its TikTok account, demonstrating how quickly public opinion can shift and spread. Social media creates an echo chamber where negative experiences and criticisms can be shared and amplified exponentially, leading to a collective sense of disillusionment. "Why does the whole world suddenly hate Crumbl?" is a question that often arises from observing these rapid shifts in online sentiment. While one user believed, "I’ve never seen anyone hate on Crumbl except for Reddit," this overlooks the widespread discussion and critique happening across various platforms, from TikTok to forums and comment sections. The constant rotation of flavors, designed to create FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out), can also backfire. If a highly anticipated cookie is a disappointment, the collective frustration is quickly aired online, contributing to the negative narrative.
The Paradox of "Hate Promo" and Viral Cycles
Interestingly, some argue that even the hate directed at Crumbl can inadvertently contribute to its continued success, creating a phenomenon known as "hate promo." "I mean Crumbl is because they’re getting hate promo (which causes people to go buy it to see if it’s that awful) and this person’s money," one perspective suggests. This theory posits that negative publicity, while seemingly damaging, can pique curiosity and drive new customers to try the product for themselves, simply to confirm or deny the criticisms. "People also get dumb and go buy the cookies and destroy" them in content, further fueling the viral cycle, even if the intent is negative. Crumbl has somehow tapped into the part of our brains that makes us do irrational things, like buying crypto or thinking we can pull off bangs. This psychological pull, combined with the sheer virality of both positive and negative content, means that even widespread criticism doesn't necessarily translate into a significant dip in sales, at least not immediately. The founders themselves, who just opened Crumbl’s first international location in Edmonton, Alberta, have heard the criticisms of their cookies, but the sales numbers don’t lie, Mr. McGowan noted, indicating that despite the backlash, the business continues to thrive. This paradox explains why the company can face such intense scrutiny yet continue its expansion.
Crumbl's Founders Respond: Navigating Criticism and Growth
The Crumbl founders, Sawyer Hemsley and Jason McGowan, are certainly aware of the criticisms leveled against their company. Their journey began with a shared dream, culminating in the rapid expansion of a brand that became a household name. However, as noted, despite hearing the criticisms of their cookies, the sales numbers don’t lie. This suggests a strategic decision to maintain their core product and business model, perhaps believing that the mass appeal and viral marketing outweigh the specific complaints from a segment of the audience. From the perspective of so many people, it’s the big, flashy, often over-the-top nature of Crumbl that appeals, rather than a refined culinary experience. This highlights a potential disconnect between what a vocal minority of critics desires (e.g., nuanced flavors, less sugar, ethical sourcing) and what the broader consumer base is willing to purchase (e.g., Instagrammable treats, novelty, convenience). While there are currently no plans from Crumbl to have more inclusive menu options or significantly alter their core recipes, the continued growth suggests that their current strategy, despite the hate, is still effective for their target demographic.
The Local Bakery Alternative: A Different Kind of Cookie Experience
In contrast to the mass-produced, often inconsistent experience of Crumbl, many critics advocate for supporting local bakeries. "Go to any other local bakery that uses real ingredients and get a cookie about the size of Crumbls, and it will have half the [calories/sugar/cost]," is a common refrain. This highlights a preference for artisanal quality, fresh ingredients, and a more authentic baking tradition. For example, some argue that Crumbl’s chocolate cookies have nothing on Levain’s chocolate/chocolate chip cookies, a well-known artisanal bakery. While Levain doesn’t have a sugar cookie, and Crumbl apparently can’t be relied on for one of those, the comparison underscores the perceived gap in quality. Similarly, "Meanwhile, Insomnia delivered with a quality, classic sugar cookie," points to other established cookie brands that consistently meet expectations. The argument is that for the same or less money, consumers can find superior taste, texture, and value at smaller, independent establishments. This comparison often fuels the "why do people hate Crumbl" narrative, as it positions Crumbl as an inferior, overpriced option when better alternatives exist locally.
Conclusion
The question of why people hate Crumbl is not simple, nor is it monolithic. It stems from a complex interplay of factors ranging from subjective taste preferences to ethical concerns about corporate practices. While the brand has undeniably achieved immense popularity and commercial success, the criticisms regarding overwhelming sweetness, inconsistent quality, high prices, questionable business ethics, and perceived health implications are valid and widely shared. The powerful influence of social media amplifies both the love and the loathing, creating a dynamic environment where viral hype can quickly turn into viral backlash.
Ultimately, whether one loves or hates Crumbl often comes down to individual priorities and expectations. For some, the novelty, size, and weekly rotation are enough to justify the cost and caloric intake. For others, the perceived lack of authentic flavor, the ethical dilemmas, and the sheer sweetness make it an experience to avoid. Remember, never feel like a) you're missing out or b) something is wrong with people who love something you don't. The diverse opinions surrounding Crumbl Cookies reflect the varied tastes and values of today's consumers. We encourage you to share your own experiences with Crumbl in the comments below. Have you found their cookies to be overrated but definitely not disgusting, or do you agree that some of the hate is justified? Explore our other articles on popular food trends and consumer insights to deepen your understanding of the evolving culinary landscape.

Why Does The Whole World Suddenly Hate Crumbl? Experts Weigh In

Why Does The Whole World Suddenly Hate Crumbl? Experts Weigh In

Why Does the Whole World Suddenly Hate Crumbl? - iKno